I was just rereading my essay, "Identity and SF: Story as Science and Fiction," to make sure it hadn't got scrambled in translation to the web, when I realised that it was writing this essay that helped push me towards writing my memoir, And Now We Are Going to Have a Party. All that stuff about memory and freezing moments via diary entries or photographs...
After I wrote that essay, in 2005, I went to look at my photos and found an old diary I'd forgotten I'd had, and was absolutely wrenched into the past. And that past was different from the stories I'd told myself all my life. I started to want to understand the strange place between truth and memory, and the memories that had made me who I am. And so I started recalling specific incidents--such as the discovery of atoms--and rootling through my stuff to find corroborating evidence. Most of the time, there wasn't any (most of the time there just isn't; it doesn't mean it didn't happen, it just means I can't be sure). Sometimes there was. Sometimes the evidence contradicted the memories. Sometimes (astonishingly often), I willfully misread the evidence the first time around, and only after repeated viewing could I see what was actually there.
Here's a scan of a poem I wrote for a friend that might illustrate what I mean:
I don't know when I wrote the poem. (1983? 1987? Probably closer to the latter: the dragon looks a bit like something I drew for Kelley in 1988, and even that was probably stolen from somewhere else--it doesn't look like the kind of thing that comes from my own imagination--but after all this time I don't remember where.) It was for a friend called Katherine who was probably in her fifties--only I didn't know that at the time. I knew she was significantly older than me but had no clue that one could be over forty and still have a life (that's yoof for you). It was her birthday. She told me it was her fortieth. Perhaps she was being ironic, but I didn't know that (sigh) and took her seriously. I wrote this poem, and copied it out on nice paper and put it in an envelope covered in illustrations of dragons and dykes in shining armour (I forget if there was a princess; probably not). And then I gave the card to Katherine. And she was furious--absolutely shook with rage as she tore the envelope open: I was making her destroy beauty; I'd wasted all my talent on something disposable. I was puzzled and a bit hurt; to me it was a doodled poem, and a doodled picture, the kind of thing one jots on the phone pad while chatting--which only seemed to infuriate her further. Looking back, running the 'memory' through my mind over and over, I believe she was angry with herself for two reasons. One, she had lied to me about something she was ashamed to be ashamed about (second-wave feminists weren't supposed to care about age and beauty, patriarchal concepts). Two, she was jealous of the fact that to me a poem and picture meant nothing, I could pump them out all day without thinking. She wanted to be a writer, but found writing difficult. And there I was wasting stuff! But I don't know; that's just what I imagine (and the kind of attitude I'd run into from my teachers all my life). I'd love to meet her again and have a beer and find out the truth of the matter.
But there's no way to include something like that in a permanent medium like a book because it's largely about someone else and it's possible I could be imagining or at least wildly misinterpreting it all. For the memoir I generally opted to talk about the person I know best, me, and chose incidents and supporting artifacts very, very carefully.
Oh, and I've no idea where I got that doctors' freebie note pad advertising Daonil. Just another mystery, another reason not to include it in the book.
Anyway, now that my early life (selections of it, anyway) is all organised and labelled and explained I feel very clear, very grounded, very certain. It's a good feeling. And it all started with an essay... Life is strange.


A very wise woman, probably a woman over forty, said, there is memory and there is truth and behind the truth is something even better.
ReplyDeleteThe story.
Yes. It's all nothing without story. Story is how we make sense of the world and our place in it.
ReplyDeleteIndeed.
ReplyDeleteLoved your essay on Identity/SF. Once again you've gotten me thinking about things in ways I haven't before. I certainly never thought about SF and love like that. I've never really understood why so many people are so against reading SF.
ReplyDeleteYour comment about not taking photos surprised me, and now I have Susan Sontag on the brain. Your statement made me look up this quote from her book "On Photography". She was talking about how people look to cameras (film and still) for our reality, "....people in industrialized countries seek to have their photographs taken — feel that they are images, and are made real by photographs."
Obviously most people do take photos to preserve occasions. I'm not really one of those types, but I do find myself wishing sometimes lately that I had done it more often. I look to them for a memory stimulant. Those old photos tell me a lot about about how things were - help me to remember, and that's why I wish I had more of them. Funny, I had been thinking kind of the opposite of what you said. I have thought that things like that would remind me exactly what really happened vs my re-interepreted mental version of it, and thereby reveal something more about it.
Here's another line from Sontag, "Photographs are a way of imprisoning reality, understood as recalcitrant, inaccessible; of making it stand still."
Interesting to think about it from your point of view of re-telling the story/story as a vehicle for growth. Not standing still.
I'm a little envious of your organizing and labeling of your early life; what a great thing.
I'm glad you liked the essay.
ReplyDeleteIt's funny, I like to have photos of occasions (preferably taken when I'm unaware of the camera) but I hate taking the photos and I hate posing for them. It injects articifiality into the moment.
And I do like to look at photos of something either immediately after the event--after the Lammy awards, say, or after our big dinner--but then I don't want to see it for years. I don't want my memory stilled, arrested. I want to give it free rein.
But looking at old pix, wow, that's a blast and very illuminating. Every time I look at that 1989 photo of me and Kelley I brim over: I *remember* how we felt that day for each other, I remember the feel of that carpet, the scent of Kelley's mum's house, the taste of Tampa water.
But I for sure don't like the medium-ago photos e.g. four or five years ago. Funnily enough, between 4 years and about 10 years back is my writing zone, the time when/where I can finally write about what was going on for me. For example, being able to write about Hull only six years after leaving. Huh. I hadn't connected those things before. Something to think about.
Anyway, it's not all as neat as I make it seem in the essay. As with all human things, it's a bit of a muddle; certainly contradictory.